Key Research Articles

Key research papers are selected from a wide variety of peer reviewed journals and are judged to be of major importance in their respective fields.

Clinical Trials

Psychology Progress features clinical trials that are considered to be of key importance in advancing the field of Psychiatry.

Neuroscience Breakthroughs

Psychology Progress features breaking Neuroscience research judged by the advisory team.

Psychologist Profile

Prominent figures in Psychology are featured to highlight their biographies and accomplishments

Events

Notable conferences, summits and other meetings for research discussion and promotion.

Home » Key Research Articles

Impact of Supplemental Tutoring Configurations for Preschoolers at Risk for Reading Difficulties

Print Friendly

Carol Vukelich, Laura M. Justice, Myae Han
Child & Youth Care Forum,February 2013, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 19-34

Abstract

Background

Providing preschoolers at-risk for reading difficulties with additional support is of increasing interest in early childhood education. However, the research on programming in preschool for this additional support is limited and yields inconclusive findings.

Objective

The current studies explore different grouping configurations in a supplemental tutoring program for at-risk preschoolers in order to provide early childhood educators with guidance on grouping strategies for use in their supplemental instruction.

Methods

Two grouping configurations are examined via two studies. In Study 1, 45 at-risk preschoolers (18 boys, 27 girls) were selected and randomly assigned to a one-on-one tutoring or paired tutoring condition. In Study 2, 54 at-risk children (31 boys, 23 girls) were selected and randomly assigned to one of two pairing conditions: with a highly-skilled peer or with a similarly low-skilled peer. In each study, children received tutoring that supplemented the classroom instruction twice a week over the academic year.

Results

In Study 1, children in both conditions made similar gains on the alphabet knowledge and phonological awareness measures and the one-on-one group outperformed the paired group on receptive vocabulary but the effect size was small. In Study 2, the children in the matched-pairing condition evidenced a trend toward greater gains than those paired with high-skilled peer on the phonological awareness measure but not on alphabet knowledge and receptive vocabulary measures.

Conclusion

The results of studies hold promise for achieving optimal outcomes by providing supplemental instruction to the maximum number of preschoolers using a dyad model instead of the typical one-on-one model.

© Springer, Part of Springer Science+Business Media

Read Full Article