Key Research Articles

Key research papers are selected from a wide variety of peer reviewed journals and are judged to be of major importance in their respective fields.

Clinical Trials

Psychology Progress features clinical trials that are considered to be of key importance in advancing the field of Psychiatry.

Neuroscience Breakthroughs

Psychology Progress features breaking Neuroscience research judged by the advisory team.

Psychologist Profile

Prominent figures in Psychology are featured to highlight their biographies and accomplishments

Events

Notable conferences, summits and other meetings for research discussion and promotion.

Home » Key Research Articles

Can Outcome Expectancies Help Explain Sex Differences in Direct and Indirect Aggression?

Print Friendly

Anthony D. G. Marks, Donald W. Hine, Gary C. Manton, Einar B. Thorsteinsson
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Volume 42, Issue 1, pages 151–169, January 2012

Abstract

This study examined the role of outcome expectancies in explaining sex differences in adolescents’ inclination to engage in acts of aggression. Using a sample of Australian adolescents, 2 scales were developed to measure outcome expectancies of direct and indirect aggression. The data were used in subsequent mediation analyses. Sex differences in direct aggression were partially mediated by 2 types of aggression expectancies. Relative to females, males anticipated more overall benefits associated with acting aggressively and less fear of reprisals from authority figures. This pattern of expectancy beliefs predicted higher levels of self-reported direct aggression. Sex differences in indirect aggression were fully mediated by anticipation of personal benefits, with males expecting greater personal benefits for engaging in this type of aggression.

 Copyright © 1999–2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Read Full Article